Hair to the throne: Meghans messy bun is perfect for a modern princess

, , , , ,

DIY hair, trouser suits and shoulder-robing point to a woman who is busy, serious and relatable. No wonder the Meghan Markle fairytale hits a happy note

I am totally intrigued to see what Meghan Markle wears on her wedding day. Go ahead and roll your eyes all you want, youre not going to make me feel bad about that. I definitely care about the dress and I absolutely believe that what the first self-proclaimed feminist to join the firm wears at the moment she becomes a royal matters. I care about who the designer is, whether it has long sleeves, whether there is a second look for the evening. Sorrynot sorry.

The
The Duchess of Cambridge in an Alexander McQueen dress, with her hair in a netted chignon at Royal Ascot 2017. Photograph: Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Images

But the most significant aspect of the Meghan Markle look isnt a dress at all, but the way she fixes her hair up: a messy bun that has become her trademark look. In January, for the couples first major public outing of this year, a visit to a Brixton radio station, the long grey coat she wore, by the Canadian label Smythe, immediately sold out. But the most compelling aspect of how she looked, the thing that lodged in my mind, was the way her hair was twisted into a casual bun, the kind you do yourself. As a veteran messy-bun wearer, I recognised that bun. Its the kind you do almost absent-mindedly, without looking in the mirror, with a few ends sticking out at the nape of the neck and some wispy bits from your middle parting tucked behind your ears.

The loose ends are what makes this style different from the chignon, worn often by the Duchessof Cambridge, which is bun-shaped but covered, invisibly, by a hairnet. Fellow bun-wearers will immediately recognise that while both techniques involve having your hair pinned at the napeof your neck, there is a world ofdifference between Kates hairnetted chignon, which requires either a hairdresser or a complex two-mirror setup, and Meghans DIYbun, which can be done in the back of a car. Althoughitwas reported in Januarythat the messiness of the bun broke royal protocol Meghanssecond transgression, after the bare-legs-no-nude-tights shocker of her engagement photos the royal-in-waiting has continuedto wear it regularly since.(For evening events such asthe Queens birthday this weekend, she tidies it up a bit.)

Meghan
Meghan Markle wearing a Smythe coat to visit a London radio station in January. Photograph: Paul Marriott/Rex/Shutterstock


Victoria
Victoria Beckham at New York fashion week last year. Photograph: JP Yim/Getty Images

Meghans bun is not in the joyless lineage of Miss Trunchbull and scary ballet teachers, but in that of the messy buns favoured by Gwyneth Paltrow when she is being photographed for her cookbook or Victoria Beckham backstage at her catwalk shows. This kind of messy bun adds an element of relatability to a glossy image. And it semaphores being busy, which is much more aspirational than being a lady of leisure these days. A packed schedule is also the subtext of a jacket worn shoulder-robe style, as Meghan did last week. Shoulder-robing is a classic Anna Wintour power move, telling the world that (a) you are too busy for sleeves and (b) you possess the kind of properly structured tailoring that sits photogenically on your shoulders and keeps its shape.

The
The Duchess of Cambridge in her Zara going-away dress, at Buckingham Palace with Prince William. Photograph: WPA Pool/Getty Images


Meghan
Meghan Markle wearing an Altuzarra dress with a Camilla and Marc blazer over her shoulders in London last week. Photograph: Pool/Reuters

Meghan and her soon-to-be-sister-in-law Kate have modernised royal style in different ways. Kate shook things up by showing that you can look like a fairytale princess while wearing high-street pieces; Meghan is shaking things up by showing that this fairytale doesnt have to mean dressing like a princess. Kate wore a 34.99 Zara dress for her going-away outfit after her wedding, and her love for a comfortable LK Bennett shoe is well evidenced.

The budget-friendly piece is important, and Meghan plays thisgame too. She wore a dress bySelf-Portrait to meet the Queen for the first time, which made her seem super normal, Self-Portrait being everyones go-to special occasion label. (She wore Self-Portrait again, on Saturday, prompting about half the women who saw the image on Instagram to shout out Ive got that dress!.) AndI am quite sure that the 45 Marks & Spencer sweater she wore in January was at least a semi-deliberate ploy to win over the British public. But what stands out most about her look is how functional it is. Hownon-princessy it is. For her very firstofficial evening engagement withHarryon 1 February, she choseablack Alexander McQueen trouser suit with a crisp white blouse, whenshecould have chosen a floor-length gown.

In 2014, the actor spoke at the One Young World conference aboutchallenging TV producers over the sexualisation of her character, the lawyer Rachel Zane. In the show, this season, every script seemed to begin with Rachel enters wearing a towel, she said. I said, No, Im not doing it any more. She has applied a little of the same approach to her public persona sincethe engagement announcement. Hemlines are longer,clothes are looser, colours more muted in her official wardrobethan they were when she was dressing for the red carpet.Meghan, who has written forElle magazine about being biracialand is a longstanding ambassador for UN Women, is deliberately playing down the dazzle to ensure that she frames herself in public as a thoughtful andsubstantial person. Sustainability is a theme in Meghanswardrobe, with lots ofStella McCartney pieces, and jeansby the ethical Welsh denimlabel Hiut.

Meghan
Meghan Markle wearing an Alexander McQueen trouser suit for her first official evening engagement with Prince Harry in February. Photograph: Rex/Shutterstock

There is a Rorschach test element to the way we view the royals. When Meghan wore a white beret in March, some style observers took it as a tribute to Princess Diana (the same milliner, Stephen Jones, designed both womens berets) while others took it as a nod to her feminist credentials (berets being a standout accessory of the latest collection from the house of Dior, whose designer Maria Grazia Chiuri has putfeminism at the centre of its world). Perhaps the British public falls for each new princess figure who joinsthe firm because, in the absence of them actually saying verymuch, we see what we want to see. But Meghans messy bun makes her perfect for 2018. Or, at least, itlooks that way to me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *